Apparently, our ambitions in supporting the studio practice with some technological facilitation coincide with some etymological relevance.
Techne (opposite of episteme – theory of knowledge) means art, craft, and practice.
(Perhaps another line of reasoning over the ways of bringing theory and practice closer together in their mutual complementation?)
Our epistemological ‘how known’ takes us along the concerns about conditions that make the knower know, and the mover move. We see a potential in using technology when studying those interactions between the knower and the known and the circumstances of such interactions, especially for introspective observations.
Tuesday 30 June 2009
traces of memory
Sharing a space with or without movement ... with or without visual presence... testing virtual habitats...
mediated relationships
One of the points that interest us is the mediated reality. Immediacy and distanciation interweaves in curious ways, especially when included in processes of self-differentiation.
Technical deficiencies can indeed be polemic...
Going back to incorporating some rhizomatic networking within and beyond the moving body, and looking at images like this makes one relate to it more as a composition of whirling, dynamic dimensions and directions in motion than an organized set of units.
The space of plurality and partiality raises the enigma of shareability and jointness, trauma and joy, phantasy and reality, with possibility of co-response.
Movement becomes an event without witnesses, unifying the external and internal, it is a glimpse of the 'forever future in the now'.
Sunday 28 June 2009
Dakadance
Experimental music/dance video by XZhi, exploring several editing concepts.
Filmed on the 24th of June 2009 on the roof of Danslab / Den Haag, with Brian, Ilse, Kenzo, Nuska and Or.
Thursday 25 June 2009
Thanks!!
We would like to thank all the dance students who joined us yesterday in our explorations ! Ilse, Or, Brian and Valeria thanks for a refreshing roof experience!
See You soon!
Wednesday 24 June 2009
A step back
We want to step back and test interaction patterns on a level that precedes the knowledge of one’s own body. Somewhat stepping behind the image based, the objectified ‘oneness’, into the constituting it ‘many’.
"Guattari's concept of subjectivity depends on an active and dynamic
recombination of the virtual and the actual. Subjectivity is no longer
exclusively located in a body: it is a collective moving-through. Remapped onto
the vocabulary of the interval, we might see subjectivity as a provocation that
effects the recomposing of bodies-in-the-making, creating not fixed subjects but
infraindividuations." (Manning 2009)
We are playing with devising a rhizomatic configuration of being, through which to initiate movements. The rhizomatic configuration of the body serves also a subversive purpose of a gate into non-hierarchical, networking processes, as opposed to those restricted by the binary, symmetrical and hierarchical ones.
What are the spatial relations in such a pre-objectified realm? What sense of coherence?
Subjectivity is said to be situated within a system of perception.. what if our perception was invalid, or incompetent? could technically imperfect environment for visual emission help learn more about such state? is deception a useful tool?
Interval
In patterns of looped, reappearing movements, where seemingly boring reiteration guides the process, there resides the virtual. It comes in as an underdog, subdued by directional recession, informally passive and draggy, yet in a form of a charged advancement on a performed loop. An interval.
The dynamics of an interval consume our interest.
A basic loop ( any circular dangling movement ) makes us observe and study the simplest unit of an interactive relation. Starting with felt engagement, ease of coordination, directional interdependence or desirability for realization, there are many dynamic qualities that might complete the list of required components, many of them seem to escape a name.
All that any interval-based movement needs is an en(-)trance, then it simply takes over. :)
In patterns of looped, reappearing movements, where seemingly boring reiteration guides the process, there resides the virtual. It comes in as an underdog, subdued by directional recession, informally passive and draggy, yet in a form of a charged advancement on a performed loop. An interval.
The dynamics of an interval consume our interest.
A basic loop ( any circular dangling movement ) makes us observe and study the simplest unit of an interactive relation. Starting with felt engagement, ease of coordination, directional interdependence or desirability for realization, there are many dynamic qualities that might complete the list of required components, many of them seem to escape a name.
All that any interval-based movement needs is an en(-)trance, then it simply takes over. :)
Thursday 18 June 2009
Body responsive versus Body potent
What is it about a Japanese warrior's potential for an energy-charged thrust which he is able to execute out of the seemingly undersized physicality? The energizing potential does not come down to the physical; it is just momentarily performed through it. The physical is an active channel that strives for harmony.
We are working with familiar choreographic patterns and physically research on the cycles of energy exchanges; observing charging interactions. We are looking at interval-based movement patterns, binding the physical trigger to its response and back to the trigger again; we are fascinated by discovering what emerges there… in between the response and a following up trigger, as a hanging in the air yet vigorous combination.
What is it about a Japanese warrior's potential for an energy-charged thrust which he is able to execute out of the seemingly undersized physicality? The energizing potential does not come down to the physical; it is just momentarily performed through it. The physical is an active channel that strives for harmony.
We are working with familiar choreographic patterns and physically research on the cycles of energy exchanges; observing charging interactions. We are looking at interval-based movement patterns, binding the physical trigger to its response and back to the trigger again; we are fascinated by discovering what emerges there… in between the response and a following up trigger, as a hanging in the air yet vigorous combination.
Cross-contextualizations
Through free-associations… theoretical devising…, let’s exchange ideas for broadening the visual experience of dance. E.g. a theatrical element of connecting the vocal/spoken with physical performance…
As we think about it - being on both, performative and viewing side, crossing the frames of time and space allows acting less as a detached provider, and more as a mediator and a stimulant of a shared (with an audience) experience.
The use of technological mediation poses unique epistemological questions. We are looking at using a video stream as a way to extend capacities and effect changes in the natural and the social receptivity on both sides.
Through free-associations… theoretical devising…, let’s exchange ideas for broadening the visual experience of dance. E.g. a theatrical element of connecting the vocal/spoken with physical performance…
As we think about it - being on both, performative and viewing side, crossing the frames of time and space allows acting less as a detached provider, and more as a mediator and a stimulant of a shared (with an audience) experience.
The use of technological mediation poses unique epistemological questions. We are looking at using a video stream as a way to extend capacities and effect changes in the natural and the social receptivity on both sides.
Wednesday 17 June 2009
impetus wanted
Aside from being served with a great portion of nausea, a good round of spinning exercise makes us talk about the vertigo effect, a form of a naturally collective experience with physical forces.
We are curious if the circling interval creates a better entry and a quicker shift in the register as grounded in a more direct connectivity within the network.
It evokes some tenacity, slime-ness sensations. It has a sort of elastic effect, extending the interacting body parts. It leaves the feel for perfect echo mediation ambiguous, right between the obscure and the transparent.
Aside from being served with a great portion of nausea, a good round of spinning exercise makes us talk about the vertigo effect, a form of a naturally collective experience with physical forces.
We are curious if the circling interval creates a better entry and a quicker shift in the register as grounded in a more direct connectivity within the network.
It evokes some tenacity, slime-ness sensations. It has a sort of elastic effect, extending the interacting body parts. It leaves the feel for perfect echo mediation ambiguous, right between the obscure and the transparent.
visualizations/body behind the curtain
We are browsing through the re-appearing techniques in Kenzo's work, one of which is developing movement as a result or side effect of visualizations.
The shifting focus and relational objectifying processes create curious gaps, interactive time gap for the movement to develop.
Take the ground melting image, for example, the focus will then be more on shaping the melting itself than shaping the movement. Movement arises by itself through relational accidentality.
a most appreciated 'puppet master authority'
We are browsing through the re-appearing techniques in Kenzo's work, one of which is developing movement as a result or side effect of visualizations.
The shifting focus and relational objectifying processes create curious gaps, interactive time gap for the movement to develop.
Take the ground melting image, for example, the focus will then be more on shaping the melting itself than shaping the movement. Movement arises by itself through relational accidentality.
a most appreciated 'puppet master authority'
Tuesday 16 June 2009
brainstorming
"As the thought transduces into a becoming-event, it actively merges with the thing's potential
"As the thought transduces into a becoming-event, it actively merges with the thing's potential
in this 
singular configuration", it creates the 'not-me' as a plural-singular entity.
now:
What emerges if we try to neutralize the space-time of the experience?
How flexible is the hierarchy?
How able are we to dive and submerge our consciousness in the experience itself without seeing it as if from the contextual outside as a human - object interaction? (seeing:
a silly guy dancing with a chair, for example)
How do we perform on the level of thought? Without stepping into the ritual?
singular configuration", it creates the 'not-me' as a plural-singular entity.now:
What emerges if we try to neutralize the space-time of the experience?
How flexible is the hierarchy?
How able are we to dive and submerge our consciousness in the experience itself without seeing it as if from the contextual outside as a human - object interaction? (seeing:
a silly guy dancing with a chair, for example)How do we perform on the level of thought? Without stepping into the ritual?
Focalizing the potentials for the emergent event, co-creating
We are exercising with integrating objects, looking for their co-performative potential as 'force through which thought-things take form'. (Manning2009)
The focus that would normally fall on the 'pre-object functionality' gets shifted further to the 'post-object potential' for interrelatedness. The attempt is to extend the shared (with an object) potential for thought-action convergence through actualization of a new network of relations.
Co-creation happens somewhere in-between in the co-constituted, non-hierarchal events. The action does not necessarily start in the human.
Shifting the quality of objectness - as an exercise can be quite comical.
We are exercising with integrating objects, looking for their co-performative potential as 'force through which thought-things take form'. (Manning2009)
The focus that would normally fall on the 'pre-object functionality' gets shifted further to the 'post-object potential' for interrelatedness. The attempt is to extend the shared (with an object) potential for thought-action convergence through actualization of a new network of relations.
Co-creation happens somewhere in-between in the co-constituted, non-hierarchal events. The action does not necessarily start in the human.
Shifting the quality of objectness - as an exercise can be quite comical.
interrelations in overlaps
How do we ´become cognizant of the fact that thoughts and activities interrelate? ´ (Manning 2009)
How do we explore "how thought itself becomes a networking?" (Manning2009)
We are exercising with 'a network' visualizations.. Trying to sense nodes of connections merge into overlapping co-relations, co-activities, co-movements.
......
We noticed movement pace slows down.. Becomes uncomfortably pretentious..
Sunday 14 June 2009
knowledge in transit
We perform a couple of (contact or solo) improvisation exercises with no agreed frame, no task attached. They are happening, they are watched, they are experienced.. We leave them with no comment.. As if we were leaving the co-created knowledge in the virtual, trusting it might have a future effect in the actual.
shifting habitats
The natural motivational habitat Kenzo is usually working within is to stay true to himself through the movement. We decided to play devil's advocate for a while and incorporate a lie as a motivational ground for movement.
Kenzo creates a powerful improvisation session.
His movement makes me create a mental image of a tall jelly monster, a construct on a shaky stand with naive 'being big and strong' aspirations. What is see is powerful and uncertain at the same time and built on somewhat irrational physical dependencies. It is potent and dense but dangerous and wobbly in expression. Curious effect...
carrying out transducing
"We never evaporate alone."
...is one of the first phrases with practical reverberations. Within studio work we are strongly against translation. Working with or through the text has nevertheless a strong inspirational potential to broaden the movement sensual encounters.
“Movement is a factor of the fact that you are actually evaporating” (Forsythe 1995 :1).
"We never evaporate alone. To posit this is to succumb to what Whitehead calls “the fallacy of misplaced concreteness (1938: 18). The concrete must remain potentially virtual: its process of relationality must never be completed. The interval is a way of conceptualizing the concreteness of movement where the concrete remains relational and the movement remains virtual." (Manning 2009)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
